TaiLexi AI日本の判例・法令
← ホーム
知財高裁

知財高判 平成19年10月18日

平成18年(行ケ)第10378号 審決取消請求事件

この判例について AI に質問

裁判所
知的財産高等裁判所
裁判年月日
平成19年10月18日 (2007-10-18)
事件番号
平成18年(行ケ)第10378号
事件名
審決取消請求事件
裁判の種類・結果
判例集等
—
分野
行政・知的財産・特許権・行政訴訟

AI 要約AI

事案の概要

  • 本件は、ビスホスホネート化合物に関する特許発明について、訂正請求後の発明(本件訂正発明)の進歩性が否定された審決の取消しを求める事件である。
  • 本件訂正発明は、骨粗鬆症治療用のビスホスホネート製剤に関するもので、投与間隔や投与量に関する特定の構成を有する。
  • 引用刊行物には、ビスホスホネートの間歇的投与(週1回又は毎月1週間)が副作用や投与困難を回避するために有効である旨の記載がある。
  • 請求人は、審決が引用刊行物の記載を誤認したと主張して、審決の取消しを求めた。
  • 原審決は、本件訂正発明が引用発明及び周知技術に基づいて容易に発明できたとして、進歩性を否定した。
  • 請求人は、引用刊行物の記載内容の認定誤り及び進歩性判断の誤りを主張した。
事案の概要・争点・判断などを表示

争点

  • 本件訂正発明が引用発明に基づいて容易に発明できたか否か
  • 引用刊行物の記載内容の認定に誤りがあるか否か
  • 本件訂正発明の構成が引用発明と実質的に同一であるか否か
  • 本件訂正発明の進歩性が否定された審決の判断に誤りがあるか否か

結論

  • 本件審決の取消しを求める請求人の請求を棄却する。

AI が本文から作成した要約です。引用の際は本文をご確認ください。

LUNAR NEWS

LUNAR NEWS

1a

1b

1c

1d

1e

1f

2a

Merck

Fosamax

2b

a b c

MERCK

2c

The difficulties with oral

bisphosphonates may favor their episodic once/week , or cyclical one week each monthadministration.

3a

3b

3c

3a

3b

3c

3c

3c

2a 2b 2c

2a

2b 2c

3c

episodic 2c

once/week

episodic once/week , or cyclical one week each month

administration episodic cyclical once/week one

week each month

LunarCorporation LunarCorporation

LunarCorporation

July 1996 April 1997

1a 1b 1c 1f

4a

4b

4c

BM 21,0955

:

1 BM 21,0955

2 BM 21,0955

BM 21,0955

BM 21,0955

3 BM 21,0955

3 4

4d

4e

4f

4g

dosage

4h

4i

a

b

a

b

4i

4b

4f

4a 4g

a b

a

b

4d

1a 1b 1f

BISPHOSPHONATES IN H. Fleisch

BONE DISEASE, From the laboratory to the patient 2nd Edition

The American Journal of Medicine

Charles H. Chesnut Alendronate Treatment of the Postmenopausal

Osteoporotic Woman: Effect of Multiple Dosages on Bone Mass and Bone RemodelingThe New England Journal of

Medicine Uri A. Liberman Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral

density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Lancet D. M. Black

4h

BM21,0955

2 BM21,0955

4c

3a 3b

BM21,0955

4c

1e

Gibbs,C.J.,Aaron,J.E.;Peacock,M.,Br.Med.J.292,pp.1227

1229 1986 1990 11

E.Sirisetal.,J.Clin.Endocrinol.Metab.,81,961-967 1996 3b

4e 4i

4g

1a 1b 1c 1f

3c

2a 2b 2c

2 3c

Calcified Tissue International M.C.de Vernejoul Different

Schedules of Administration of 3 Amino-1-Hydroxypropylidene -1, 1 BisphosphonateInduce Different Changes in Pig Bone Remodeling

2c

2c episodic once/week

episodic

once/week

once/week one week each month

may favor

2c potentially

Some U. S. physicians are reluctant to treat because of: a

side effects, b difficulty of dosing, and c high costs $700/year .

a b c $700/

This antagonism

possibly could be a factor in the unexpectedly high frequency of side effects and dosingdifficulties.

side

effects difficulty of dosing

dosing problem

difficulty of dosing side effects

4d

1a 1b 1f

3a 3b

2 BM21,0955

BM21,0955

BM21,0955

3 BM21,0955

BM21,0955

LUNAR NEWS FROM THE LEADER

IN BONE MEASUREMENT

In This Issue

LunarNews is published three times a year. Subscriptions are

free. For information about receiving this publication, contact Lunar Corp. LunarNewsLunar Corp. Lunar Corporation

Lunar Corporation

LunarNews is copyrighted by Lunar Corporation, United States, who is whollyresponsible for the content. LunarNews Lunar Corporation

Therapy Update

Bisphosphonate

REFERENCES

LUNAR NEWS Lunar Corporation

Lunar Corporation

2 Studies over the past decade have given

physicians confidence that bisphosphonates,and in particular alendronate,are useful intreating osteoporosis. Control of alendronate administration,as in the FIT study,canminimize side effects. In the FIT study,40% of the placebo group had uppergastrointestinal problems compared to 41.3% in the alendronate-treated group.FIT

Oral bisphosphonate therapy in subjects older than 70 years is complicated bygastro-esophageal and intestinal difficulties more than in younger patients.the potential side-effects

In pigs, the bisphosphonate dose can be reduced without adverse effect

on skeletal response by giving a standard "daily dose" every fourth day, or for 5 days outof 20 23 .

3 2c episodic once/week

episodic once/week

may favor

2c

potentially

episodic once/week

once/week episodic

once/week episodic

may favor potentially 2c

2c

side effects difficulty of

dosing 2c dosing problem

difficulty of dosing side effects

Some U. S. physicians are reluctant to treat because

of: a side effects, b difficulty of dosing, and c high cost $700/year . First,Merck recently sent a letter to physicians warning of esophagitis. Some physicians reportthat 5 to 15% of patients experience gastric and/or esophogeal distress, but most have seenno side effects. Serious side-effects of ulceration and stricture appear rare 14 . Second,some patients also stop alendronate because of the dosing difficulty. The limitedbioavailability of alendronate 0.8% requires that it be taken on an empty stomach uponawakening with a full glass of water not tea, coffee, or juice , and the patient mustremain upright for 30 to 60 minutes 15 . A few elderly women can tolerate this regimefor a only week or two. a , b

c Merck

First,

Second, a side effects b

difficulty of dosing

Third,

side effects

This antagonism possibly could be a factor in the

unexpectedly high frequency of side effects and dosing difficulties.

The

difficulties with oral bisphosphonates may favor their episodic once/week , or cyclicalone week each month administration. Even oral alendronate potentially could be givenin a 40 or 80 mg dose once/week to avoid dosing problems and reduce costs.2c

2c dosing problems

Herbert Fleisch

BISPHOSPHONATES IN BONE DISEASE alendronate is very well tolerated

up to a daily oral dose of 20mg. At 40mg signs of upper gastrointestinal intolerance mayoccur. alendronate is very well tolerated at the recommended dosage.

The American Journal of Medicine

Charles H. Chesnut, Alendronate Treatment of the Postmenopausal

Osteoporotic Woman: Effect of Multiple Dosages on Bone Mass and Bone RemodelingThe only adverse clinical or laboratory effects that appeared to be

related to alendronate were upper gastrointestinal intolerance and rash. The formerincluded nausea, dyspepsia, mild esophagitis/gastritis, and abdominal pain, and occurredprimarily in the first year during treatment with 40 mg alendronate. Seven and 2 patientsdiscontinued study participation due to adverse gastrointestinal effects in the first andsecond years, respectively. Of these 9 patients withdrawn from alendronate therapy due toan adverse upper gastrointestinal effects, 7 were receiving 40 mg and only 1 was receiving

a dose lower than 20 mg.

Therapy with

alendronate was associated with few side effects; upper gastrointestinal intolerance was themost common adverse experience,and was usually related to the 40-mg dosage. In thisstudy, alendronate treatment for 2 years improved and maintained skeletal bone mass. Theoptimal dosage, associated with minimal side effects, appears to be 5 to 10 mg. At suchdodages, alendronate therapy appeared to be well tolerated and effective for the treatmentof osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in this study.

The New England Journal of Medicine

Uri A. Liberman EFFECT OF ORAL

ALENDRONATE ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY AND THE INCIDENCE OF

FRACTURES IN POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS

Continuous therapy with 10 mg of alendronate per day provided maximal efficacy, waswell tolerated and is therefore the optimal dose for the treatment of osteoporosis inpostmenopausal women.

Today's Therapeutic Trends

Jonathan D. Adachi Osteoporosis Its

Diagnosis,Management and Treatment with a New Oral Bisphosphonate Agent,

Etidronate Efficacy of alendronate was demonstrated in a recently

reported publication. 36 In a three-year randomized, double-blind,

placebo-controlled,multicentered study, 994 subjects were treated with either placebo oralendronate 5, 10 or 20 mg/day. All were supplemented with calcium 500 mg/day.Alendronate produced increases in BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, forearm andtotal body at all doses. Increases in BMD continued throughout the three years of study.As the efficacy of 10 mg/day was found to be comparable to that of 20 mg/day, while 5mg/day was less effective, 10 mg/day was determined to be the appropriate alendronatedose.

TABLE 1

BM21,0955

BM21,0955

4c

BM21,0955 3

4h

a

b

4i

BM21,0955

4d

BM21,0955

4c

BM21,095

BM21,0955

BM21,0955

BM21,0955

2 BM21,0955

3a 3b 3c

Studies over the past decade have

given physicians confidence that bisphosphonates, and in particular alendronate, are usefulin treating osteoporosis. Control of alendronate administration, as in the FIT study, canminimize side effects. In the FIT study, 40% of the placebo group had uppergastrointestinal problems compared to 41.3% in the alendronate-treated group.FIT

FIT

Oral bisphosphonate therapy in subjects older than 70 years is

complicated by gastro-esophageal and intestinal difficulties more than in younger parties.2a 2b 2c

2c

出典:裁判所ウェブサイト「裁判例検索」(https://www.courts.go.jp/hanrei/35283/detail7/index.html)。本文は同サイト掲載の判決書PDFからTaiLexi AIがテキスト化・整形したもの(正確な文言は原本PDFを参照)。判示事項・裁判要旨・参照法条は裁判所の公表どおり。